It’s Prince Harry vs. The Crown again! While King Charles was busy visiting Italy, his youngest son was dealing with some serious legal drama. The Duke of Sussex recently Prince Harry flew 5,000 miles back to the UK to attend a two-day hearing at the High Court. What’s the issue? He’s fighting over security arrangements for his family, especially his little children, Archie and Lilibet. But not everyone back home was happy to see him return. Catch the whole tea below.
Prince Harry: Brooks Claims Harry Has “Tarnished” Royal Reputation
The latest royal showdown involves Prince Harry wanting his security back, but the royal family doesn’t want to waste taxpayers’ money. Moreover, the least he wanted was the right to pay for his own first-class protection. The Duke’s barrister addressed the issue and told the court that the Prince’s “life is at stake” since his security was sacked.
Surprisingly, Harry’s plea didn’t gain sympathy and instead triggered rage from the UK’s usual commentator crew. Adam Brooks went full savage on GB News and claimed the Sussexes have “tarnished” the reputation of the Royal Family globally.
“He [Harry] can rot outside it and doesn’t deserve any security, in my opinion,” Brooks added. But that’s not all! In addition, the panelist said that Charles’ youngest son should not have taxpayer-funded security. Mark Littlewood from the Popular Conservatives also jumped in with his hot take.
The Court Delays the Verdict
According to him, Harry lost the right to constant royal protection the moment he quit his royal duties. “He should not be getting it. He has made his decision to absent himself from royal duties,” Littlewood added. He thinks protection should only be case-by-case, not a 24/7 royal perk.
On the flip side, royal commentator Nina Myskow picked Harry’s side. “She began with, “It really pains me to see just what a waste of a great royal Harry was.” Furthermore, Myskow reminded everyone that the Invictus Games founder wasn’t asking for taxpayer cash in the first place.
“He said he’d pay for it himself, but he’s not allowed to do that,” she explained. As for the court’s decision, Judge Sir Geoffrey Vos told Harry they won’t be hearing the verdict soon. So, it’s a waiting game for our royal. Don’t miss out on more updates on Prince Harry at Soap Opera Daily. Do you think Harry should have the right to pay for his security?
